[Compall] Fwd: Authors en IEEE Newsletter: Volume 10, Issue 3, May 2025

[nilda.xolo]

Muchas gracias, Dr.

Saludos
Nilda Xolo


El 2025-05-21 12:10, esucar escribió:
> Hola,
> 
> Les comparto algunas sugerencias del IEEE para como contestar
> a los revisores que me parece muy útiles.
> 
> Saludos,
> Enrique
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Mensaje Original --------
> Asunto: Authors en IEEE Newsletter: Volume 10, Issue 3, May 2025
> Fecha: 2025-05-21 18:02
> De: IEEE Author Center <ieee-author-center en deliver.ieee.org>
> Destinatario: esucar en inaoep.mx
> Responder a: t.mckerahan en ieee.org
> 
> Newsletter from IEEE Publishing Operations to share news and tips about
> publishing at IEEE
> To view this email as a web page, click here
> 
>  [ Image ]
> 
> Volume 10     •    Issue 3    • May 2025
> 
> Inside this Issue
> 
>  [ Image ]
> 
> This edition brings you guidance about how to respond to challenging
> reviewer comments, how to give your article context through a solid
> literature review, and how to submit a nomination for the _Proceedings
> of the IEEE_ Best Paper Award.
> 
> Responding to Challenging Reviewer Comments
> 
> Most comments from reviewers are straightforward for the author to
> address but, occasionally, an author may receive comments that present
> more of a challenge. Below are some tips for handling challenging
> feedback.
> 
> The reviewer misunderstood something in the article. When this happens,
> it can be tempting to dismiss the reviewer as someone who is not
> knowledgeable or insightful enough to be taken seriously. However,
> remember that it is your responsibility as an author to explain your
> research and your conclusions to the reviewer, and eventually, to the
> reader of your published article as well. If the reviewer misunderstood
> something, perhaps the reader of the published article will
> misunderstand it as well. Instead of being dismissive, take the
> viewpoint that there is always room for improvement and try to bring
> more clarity to the area the reviewer is questioning.
> 
> The reviewer asks questions or requests additional data that your
> research does not address. In your response to the reviewers, you can
> acknowledge that the requested answers or data would be useful but
> respectfully state that the scope of your current research project does
> not include those items.
> 
> Your article’s reviewers contradict each other. Your first step should
> be to re-read the Editor’s comments in the decision letter; the Editor
> may have weighed in on the debate in favor of one side or the other. If
> the Editor did not comment or left it up to you to decide, you should
> consider each reviewer’s points carefully and then choose the
> suggestion that you agree with the most. Justify your choice to the
> other reviewer in your response.
> 
> The reviewer asks you to add additional references, some of which seem
> irrelevant to your subject matter. It is not uncommon for a reviewer to
> recommend that you update your reference list with one or two of the
> most recent articles in the field. However, if the reviewer requests
> references to irrelevant material, or an excessive number of 
> references,
> contact your Editor-in-Chief immediately and explain your concerns,
> before you submit your revised article. Your Editor-in-Chief’s contact
> information is available on the publication’s homepage in the IEEE
> _Xplore_® Digital Library.
> 
> The reviewer contacts you directly about your submission. This is a
> serious breach of publishing ethics. Do not respond to the reviewer;
> instead, notify the Editor-in-Chief immediately and provide full 
> details
> about the communication that you received from the reviewer.
> 
> Watch the “Tips for Responding to Reviewers’ Comments” video
> tutorial for more guidance on this topic.
> 
> Give Your Article Context and Depth with a Review of Relevant Works
> 
> A key part of writing your article is to include a brief review of
> relevant literature in the Introduction section. A good literature
> review introduces your topic to the reader and provides context
> regarding recent developments and the current state of research in the
> field. It also illustrates how your work is novel and how it will
> advance knowledge about the topic.
> 
> Your article’s literature review should be no more than two or three
> paragraphs long; to stay within that limit, avoid elaborating on any of
> the studies in your literature review or quoting from them directly. 
> (If
> commenting on, or quoting from, another study that is fundamental to
> your argument, consider doing so in the Discussion section, where you
> can properly place the comment or quote in the context of your own
> work.)
> 
> The most efficient way to create your article’s literature review is
> to plan for it from the start. You probably searched relevant 
> literature
> before you began your research to ensure that you were not duplicating
> someone else’s published work; when conducting that initial search,
> investing some time in taking careful notes will make writing the
> literature review much easier later on. In addition to collecting the
> citation information for each relevant article that you find during 
> your
> search, consider recording the answers to helpful questions such as:
> 
>  	* What are the high-level findings reported in the article?
>  	* How relevant is the article to your work?
>  	* How recent is the article? Does it contain the most up-to-date
> information?
>  	* Is there an erratum, publisher’s note, or retraction associated
> with the article?
>  	* Can you identify any potential issues with the article’s
> methodology or interpretation?
> 
> With the above notes in hand for a collection of relevant articles,
> writing your literature review becomes quite straightforward. First, if
> it’s been more than a few weeks since you last searched the
> literature, do another quick search of recently published articles to
> capture any new material in your review. Next, organize your literature
> review material into an outline, starting with a broad, foundational
> overview and then narrowing the focus to your specific area of 
> interest.
> Finally, start writing by following the flow of your outline, adding
> context and connection as needed. Don’t worry about getting the words
> exactly right the first time; it’s best to just start writing and then
> return to your draft later to refine it. By the time you’re done, you
> should have a cohesive, high-level summary of your topic’s recent
> history and current status, which you can add to the Introduction
> section of your article to help readers understand your work.
> 
> Consult the IEEE Author Center for more guidance on how to structure
> your article.
> 
> Call for Nominations for _Proceedings of the IEEE_ Best Paper Award
> 
> _Proceedings of the IEEE_ is seeking nominations for its Best Paper
> Award, which recognizes an outstanding survey, review, or tutorial 
> paper
> published in the journal that holds broad significance and has 
> potential
> lasting impact. The deadline to submit a nomination for the award is 1
> July. Submit a nomination today.
> 
> Author Resources
> 
> IEEE Author Center
> 
> IEEE Publication Recommender
> 
> IEEE Template Selector
> 
> IEEE AuthorLab
> 
> IEEE LaTeX Analyzer
> 
> IEEE Reference Preparation Assistant
> 
> IEEE PDF Checker
> 
> IEEE Author Support: authors en ieee.org
> 
> IEEE PSPB Operations Manual
> 
> If you have an IEEE Account, manage your IEEE communications 
> preferences
> here. Users without an IEEE Account can access the Privacy Portal to
> view selected preferences and policies.
> 
> Unsubscribe | Website |  Privacy Policy |  Contact
> 
>  [ ieee logo ]
> 
> © 2025 IEEE– All rights reserved.
> 
> IEEE • 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
> *********
> AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su
> caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo pueden contener información de
> carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención
> única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido.
> La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha
> información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito del Instituto
> Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE) está prohibida.
> Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo,
> favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y
> eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como
> cualquiera copia de este. Mediante la recepción del presente correo
> usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o
> de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, este Centro
> Público de Investigación tendrá el derecho de reclamar los daños y
> perjuicios que dicha vulneración le cause; asimismo se hace de su
> conocimiento que el Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y
> Electrónica (INAOE) está obligado a salvaguardar los datos personales
> que le sean proporcionados por terceros, en los términos de la Ley
> General de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos
> Obligados.
> AVISO DE PRIVACIDAD, En cumplimiento con la Ley General de Protección
> de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados, al recibir datos
> de carácter personal a través de este medio, se entiende el
> consentimiento expreso del titular de los datos personales para
> utilizarlos en actividades propias del Instituto Nacional de
> Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE). Para mayor información, lo
> invitamos a consultar el Aviso de Privacidad en nuestro portal:
> https://www.inaoep.mx
*********
AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido. La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito del Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE) está prohibida. Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo, favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como cualquiera copia de este. 
Mediante la recepción del presente correo usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, este Centro Público de Investigación tendrá el derecho de reclamar los daños y perjuicios que dicha vulneración le cause; asimismo se hace de su conocimiento que el Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE) está obligado a salvaguardar los datos personales que le sean proporcionados por terceros, en los términos de la Ley General de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados.
AVISO DE PRIVACIDAD, En cumplimiento con la Ley General de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados, al recibir datos de carácter personal a través de este medio, se entiende el consentimiento expreso del titular de los datos personales para utilizarlos en actividades propias del Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE). Para mayor información, lo invitamos a consultar el Aviso de Privacidad en nuestro portal: https://www.inaoep.mx